All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: PROBLEM: Consistently slower 3ware RAID performance under 2.6.4
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:41:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <406D89B8.4090308@techsource.com> (raw)

## Background:

I'm doing a lot of sequential read and write performance tests on my 
3ware 7000-2 controller (RAID1 with 2xWD1200JB), because I'm getting 
very poor write performance.  This is a problem that I'm currently 
working with 3ware to resolve, and they are working enthusiastically 
with me to fix it.

Read test:    time dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=1024
Write test:   time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda2 bs=1024k count=1024

NOTE:  /dev/sda2 is the swap partition which is NEAR the outer-most tracks.


## The new problem I discovered specific to Linux:

Regardless of the above-mentioned problem, I am noticing a very 
significant performance drop between a 2.4 kernel and a 2.6 kernel.


## Performance with "2.4.25-gentoo":

The read test here takes 21.6 seconds which is about 47MB/sec.  This is 
a correct number, because I have measured the maximum read throughput 
from each drive to be 47MB/sec.

The write test here takes 2 minutes, 2.5 seconds.  This translates to 
8.35MB/sec.  This is what I'm working with 3ware to correct, but let's 
call this the baseline write performance.


## Performance with "2.6.4-gentoo-r1":

The read test here takes 33.9 seconds.  That's down to about 30MB/sec.

The write test here takes 2 minutes, 44.2 seconds.  That is down to 
6.2MB/sec.


## HELP?

How can I help kernel developers to diagnose this problem?  What 
information do I need to provide that is missing?

What is responsible for such a significant performance drop on LONG 
sequential disk accesses?


## My computer:

Athlon 2800+
1GB RAM  (Corsair 2700LL)
ABIT KD7 (KT400 chipset)


Thanks in advance for the help!


             reply	other threads:[~2004-04-02 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-02 15:41 Timothy Miller [this message]
2004-04-02 23:47 ` PROBLEM: Consistently slower 3ware RAID performance under 2.6.4 Andrew Morton
2004-04-05 15:14   ` Timothy Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=406D89B8.4090308@techsource.com \
    --to=miller@techsource.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.