From: sean <seandarcy@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: irq 16 : Nobody cared - alsa v. io-apic in 2.6.5-rc3-bk2
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:34:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <406E06A7.1000003@hotmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1080897252.30361.147.camel@dhcppc4>
Len Brown wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 14:24, sean wrote:
>
>>I have a VIA k400 motherboard.
>>
>
>
>>irq 16: nobody cared!
>>Call Trace:
>> [<c0108508>] __report_bad_irq+0x28/0x80
........................
>>handlers:
>>[<c0395800>] (snd_cmipci_interrupt+0x0/0x130)
>>Disabling IRQ #16
>>..............
>
> Does acpi=off make a difference and change how /proc/interrupts looks?
>
> If yes, can you try the latest ACPI code that 2.6.5 is missing?
> http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.6.5/
>
> thanks,
> -Len
Correct on all counts. acpi=off changed how /proc/interrupts looked.
Plain rc3-bk2:
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 24465969 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 3894 IO-APIC-edge i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
11: 0 IO-APIC-edge ohci1394, radeon@PCI:1:0:0
12: 208554 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 484633 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1
16: 100000 IO-APIC-level CMI8738-MC6
18: 96443 IO-APIC-level eth1
21: 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd
With acpi=off:
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 411879 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1037 IO-APIC-edge i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
12: 15358 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 13668 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1
16: 21258 IO-APIC-level ohci1394, CMI8738-MC6, radeon@PCI:1:0:0
18: 404 IO-APIC-level eth1
21: 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd
And the patch worked.
With the patch:
cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
0: 138277 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 942 IO-APIC-edge i8042
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
8: 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
12: 918 IO-APIC-edge i8042
14: 11189 IO-APIC-edge ide0
15: 24 IO-APIC-edge ide1
16: 7731 IO-APIC-level ohci1394, CMI8738-MC6, radeon@PCI:1:0:0
18: 177 IO-APIC-level eth1
21: 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd, uhci_hcd
Thanks for all your help. When should we see the patch in the kernel?
sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-03 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <A6974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A6647615F7212@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2004-04-02 9:14 ` irq 16 : Nobody cared - alsa v. io-apic in 2.6.5-rc3-bk2 Len Brown
2004-04-03 0:34 ` sean [this message]
2004-04-03 1:16 ` Len Brown
2004-04-01 19:24 sean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=406E06A7.1000003@hotmail.com \
--to=seandarcy@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.