From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: camis Subject: Re: reiserfs v3 patches updated Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 21:17:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4073022E.3090100@mweb.co.za> References: <1081210239.4994.69.camel@watt.suse.com> <200404061838.05099.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net> <4072F6F1.3090806@mweb.co.za> <1081277245.30813.81.camel@watt.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <1081277245.30813.81.camel@watt.suse.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com >>Has anyone done any throughput/benchmarks for the various >>new patches/code? > > The block allocator stuff is fresh from the oven and still warm inside. > I'll be posting benchmarks for it as the week goes on. Something interesitng: I have 8 dell 2650's (dual xeon 2.8ghz+hyperthreading) and i've setup the one machine above with the patches.. All 8 machines are incoming MX/smtp machines which handle quite large loads (5gigs of mail per day). machine 1: (mounted:noatime,nodiratime,data=ordered,alloc=skip_busy:dirid_groups,packing_groups) 21:16:17 up 12:17, 1 user, load average: 0.45, 1.04, 1.07 375 processes: 374 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle total 7.2% 0.0% 32.4% 0.0% 0.8% 5.2% 353.2% cpu00 1.8% 0.0% 10.6% 0.1% 0.9% 1.3% 85.0% cpu01 1.5% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.9% 89.9% cpu02 1.7% 0.0% 7.0% 0.0% 0.1% 1.7% 89.3% cpu03 1.8% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 0.1% 1.5% 88.9% Iowait total stays hovering at around the 6->8% mark.. machine 2->8: (mounted: noatime,nodiratime) 21:14:31 up 1 day, 8:41, 1 user, load average: 0.43, 0.72, 0.66 392 processes: 391 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle total 8.0% 0.0% 35.2% 0.0% 1.6% 0.8% 352.8% cpu00 2.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.1% 1.5% 0.3% 84.6% cpu01 2.0% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 89.5% cpu02 2.2% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 89.5% cpu03 1.8% 0.0% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 89.3% The majority of the rest of the machines iowait hover around the 1% mark.. CPU time tends to be about the same, just the iowait is much much higher.. Cami