From: Cami <camis@mweb.co.za>
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: reiserfs v3 patches updated
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 23:30:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40732185.8060303@mweb.co.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1081285851.30813.269.camel@watt.suse.com>
>>>I'm a little slow today. data=ordered is the default with these
>>>patches. You need to mount -o data=writeback.
>>
>>data=writeback yields pretty much the same iowait results..
>>(machine 1+2 are around 5%->8% whereas machine 3->8 are at around 0.8%)
>
> This is so much faster I'm worried the io isn't actually getting done.
> In the mail server benchmark I use (synctest -n 1 -t 50 -f -F), the time
> went from 2m15s to 43s. The old 2m15s was still faster then I used to
> get with unpatched reiserfs.
>
> I'm posting this for the truly brave among you and a little review. I
> need to do more tests on it. The basic idea is to make sure we don't
> start writeback on the log buffers and metadata if someone is already
> doing it.
>
> Also, the reiserfs work queue is not kicked during transaction end if
> some other process is going to do the commit. This saves a lot of
> context switches.
And just as i was about to head into bed ;)
23:26:25 up 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.62, 0.36, 0.14
340 processes: 339 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 7.6% 0.0% 30.8% 0.0% 1.2% 0.4% 358.8%
cpu00 1.7% 0.0% 6.6% 0.1% 1.1% 0.1% 90.0%
cpu01 2.1% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 86.7%
cpu02 2.0% 0.0% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 90.6%
cpu03 1.9% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 91.1%
23:27:11 up 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.40, 0.34, 0.14
343 processes: 342 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 6.8% 0.0% 26.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.4% 364.8%
cpu00 1.7% 0.0% 5.9% 0.1% 0.9% 0.1% 91.0%
cpu01 1.5% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.1%
cpu02 1.9% 0.0% 4.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 93.1%
cpu03 1.9% 0.0% 9.9% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 87.9%
23:27:21 up 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.63, 0.40, 0.16
343 processes: 342 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 8.0% 0.0% 28.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.4% 360.8%
cpu00 2.2% 0.0% 6.1% 0.1% 1.1% 0.0% 90.2%
cpu01 2.0% 0.0% 10.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 86.8%
cpu02 1.7% 0.0% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 91.6%
cpu03 1.7% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 92.3%
23:27:32 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.53, 0.38, 0.16
343 processes: 341 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 10.0% 0.0% 35.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.8% 350.8%
cpu00 2.4% 0.0% 8.3% 0.1% 1.3% 0.1% 87.4%
cpu01 2.6% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 85.1%
cpu02 2.4% 0.0% 7.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 89.3%
cpu03 2.4% 0.0% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 89.1%
23:27:37 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.49, 0.38, 0.16
343 processes: 342 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 6.4% 0.0% 26.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 365.2%
cpu00 1.7% 0.0% 5.9% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 91.6%
cpu01 1.5% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 88.9%
cpu02 1.7% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 92.5%
cpu03 1.7% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 92.2%
23:27:47 up 6 min, 1 user, load average: 0.41, 0.36, 0.16
343 processes: 342 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 8.0% 0.0% 29.2% 0.0% 1.2% 0.4% 360.0%
cpu00 2.0% 0.0% 9.7% 0.1% 0.9% 0.1% 86.8%
cpu01 2.2% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 91.6%
cpu02 1.7% 0.0% 7.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 90.6%
cpu03 2.4% 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 91.0%
Hrmph! Its not going above 0.8% iowait.. it hangs around the 0.0% ->
0.04% mark.. Looks good, thanks.. ;)
Regards,
Cami
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-06 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-06 0:10 reiserfs v3 patches updated Chris Mason
2004-04-06 16:38 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-06 16:48 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 18:29 ` camis
2004-04-06 18:47 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 19:17 ` camis
2004-04-06 19:24 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 19:53 ` camis
2004-04-06 20:29 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 20:38 ` Cami
2004-04-06 20:33 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 20:51 ` Cami
2004-04-06 21:10 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-06 21:30 ` Cami [this message]
2004-04-06 21:39 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-07 9:28 ` reiserfs v3 patches updated - Bug Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-07 13:07 ` Chris Mason
[not found] ` <200404071714.39187.christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net>
2004-04-07 23:58 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-13 14:57 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-04-10 22:53 ` reiserfs v3 patches updated Hubert Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40732185.8060303@mweb.co.za \
--to=camis@mweb.co.za \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.