From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philip Craig Subject: Re: where did ipt_unclean go in kernel 2.6.5 ? Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 10:31:36 +1000 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40734BE8.6060100@snapgear.com> References: <407324E2.5080408@diwancomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <407324E2.5080408@diwancomputing.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Madhav Diwan Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, mvdiwan@hotmail.com Madhav Diwan wrote: > Just curious but where did the unclean match target disappear to? I > thought that was part of the base iptables target set. It was removed in 2.6. See the following for the reasons: http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-devel/2003-August/012199.html > patchomatic-ng was no help either. It should eventually turn up in pom-ng, but nobody has cared enough about it yet to get it working for 2.6. > By the way , as a side note, just which iptables patches DO apply to the > kernel 2.6 series? its at version 2.6.5 now and severely needs some > firewalling support. , for instance h323 and the failover connection > tracking? The patch-o-matic-ng/*/info files give the version requirements for each patch. Again, it's just a matter of someone needing them enough to fix them for 2.6. -- Philip Craig - SnapGear, A CyberGuard Company - http://www.SnapGear.com