From: Dave Peverley <dpeverley@mpc-data.co.uk>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Ethernet and detecting MAC addresses
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:26:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40740FA9.5060401@mpc-data.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040407130935.DE5BBC133F@atlas.denx.de>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>AFAICT from the source I'm using (1.0.2) none of the ethernet drivers
>>bother with detecting their own MAC address (if available) and rather
> Please explain what you mean by ".drivers...their own MAC address".
Apologies for the lazy way I posed the question - if you would like
I will rephrase in a more verbose manner utilising technically correct
terms, but given that you answered the question I was asking anyway,
do you really want me to?
> Some ethernet devices may have persistent storage for a MAC address,
> but most of them (especially those in embedded processors) don't.
Ok, I agree, but the boards I am developing on, do and I would like to
support it...
> It is intentional and necessary be design, because there simple _is_
> _no_ stored MAC address anywhere around.
At the least I know that all the omap boards (1510 Inn, 1610 Inn, 1610 H2,
and the new one I'm wworking on) all have stored addresses and are supported
by u-boot, hence my question....
> Read the README, which documents what is beind done now, and follow
> the existing design rules (see section "Note for Redundant Ethernet
> Interfaces").
Thanks, that helps.
Marius Groeger Wrote :
> Actually the smc91111.c driver does something of the sort. See the
> function get_rom_mac(). This is a very simplistic approach and it is
> also invisible to the overall uboot structure. Maybe you can live with
> such an approach?
If thats whats being done for the driver and has been accepted into CVS
then that sounds like an excellent place to start :-) Thanks!
> Many embedded boards, however, will store their MAC address simply
> in the global environment, so that's probably the reason why you
> don't find what you're looking for.
Sure I noticed that hence asking the question. I know its not necessary,
but is a big convenience to not have to individually programme every
installed boards u-boot with a ficticious unique address when theres one
availiable in ROM....!
Best Wishes,
Dave Peverley
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Peverley, Software Engineer, MPC Data Limited.
Phone : [+44] (0) 1225 868 228 Web : http://www.mpc-data.co.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 11:18 [U-Boot-Users] Ethernet and detecting MAC addresses Dave Peverley
2004-04-07 13:09 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-04-07 14:26 ` Dave Peverley [this message]
2004-04-07 13:48 ` Marius Groeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40740FA9.5060401@mpc-data.co.uk \
--to=dpeverley@mpc-data.co.uk \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.