From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Blandford <mlblandf@sedona.ch.intel.com>
Subject: Re: autofs4 patches for 2.6 kernel
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:00:22 -0700
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <407479F6.1070401@sedona.intel.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404071952170.4948@raven.themaw.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404071952170.4948@raven.themaw.net>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>

Ian Kent wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Some progress on getting the autofs4 patches into the kernel tree.
>
>Could anyone that is able to test within a 2.6 envronment please test this 
>as much as possible and feed back the results.
>
>There are bound to be problems so it would be good to be pro-active.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>  
>
Just to make sure I understand before I start testing -

Are all 2.6 patches now in the mm2 kernel or are there others I need to 
add as well?

Michael