From: Marcus Hartig <m.f.h@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.5 latencytest +aa5 +mm3 as/cfq scheduler
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 23:47:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407719E5.8050203@web.de> (raw)
Hello,
I've done some benchs with:
http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/alsa.html#LatencyTest
Test condition:
CPU load = 0.8
RTC freq = 1024
RTC wakeup count = 2
Deadline = 2
X-test = yes
Proc-test = yes
Disk-test = yes
Filesize = 1000000000
With the last stable kernel release 2.6.5 compared with -aa5 and -mm3 to
see which scheduler/kernel has a good or low latency.
XP Barton 2800+, 512MB PC-333, Abit NF-S-V2 nForce2, SATA Maxtor 80GB,
ASUS 5700 FX. Fedora Core 1.91 test2, xorg-x11-0.6.6-0.2004_03_30.5, GNOME
2.6, libata, reiserfs. Same .config as possible. All fresh booted in
init5, latencytest-0.5.2 running in each case from an xterm.
---------- 2.6.5-mm3 CFQ scheduler ----------
x11.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08855e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645209
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.06087 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 39555, factor = 99.9798%
within 2ms = 39563, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.021617
proc.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08855e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645240
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.02978 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 15406, factor = 99.9676%
within 2ms = 15411, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0219986
diskwrite.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08855e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645217
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.03607 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 15484, factor = 99.9548%
within 2ms = 15491, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0451227
diskcopy.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08855e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644828
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.0494 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 53058, factor = 99.9699%
within 2ms = 53074, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0380116
diskread.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08855e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645205
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.25948 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 37351, factor = 99.9304%
within 2ms = 37377, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0339693
---------- 2.6.5-mm3 AS scheduler ----------
x11.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08832e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645104
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.05296 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 38316, factor = 99.9791%
within 2ms = 38324, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0216183
proc.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08832e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645163
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.03901 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 15405, factor = 99.9546%
within 2ms = 15412, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0223874
diskwrite.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08832e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645114
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.06489 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 16688, factor = 99.9521%
within 2ms = 16696, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0433707
diskcopy.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08832e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644503
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.10258 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 38427, factor = 99.9662%
within 2ms = 38440, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0456989
diskread.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08832e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645152
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.44847 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 34704, factor = 99.928%
within 2ms = 34729, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0357967
---------- 2.6.5-aa5 AS scheduler ----------
x11.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08797e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645080
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.05035 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 39333, factor = 99.9797%
within 2ms = 39341, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0215519
proc.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08797e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644734
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.04263 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 15399, factor = 99.9675%
within 2ms = 15404, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0220961
diskwrite.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08797e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645054
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.08033 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 14817, factor = 99.9393%
within 2ms = 14826, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0457863
diskcopy.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08797e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645086
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.1242 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 38657, factor = 99.9586%
within 2ms = 38673, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0395391
diskread.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08797e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645088
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.42394 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 35125, factor = 99.926%
within 2ms = 35151, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0341163
---------- 2.6.5 AS scheduler ----------
x11.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08801e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645059
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.0537 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 39353, factor = 99.9771%
within 2ms = 39362, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0218243
proc.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08801e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645044
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.03839 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 15404, factor = 99.9416%
within 2ms = 15413, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.0226547
diskwrite.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08801e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 644705
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 4.51782 ms (overrun 4)
within 1ms = 13287, factor = 99.9248%
within 2ms = 13293, factor = 99.9699%
deviation = 0.0516117
diskcopy.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08801e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645081
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 4.09889 ms (overrun 1)
within 1ms = 37387, factor = 99.9358%
within 2ms = 37410, factor = 99.9973%
deviation = 0.043017
diskread.log:
cpu_hz = 2.08801e+09
cpu_load=0.800000 loops per run = 645099
total latency = 1.953125 ms
cpu latency = 1.562500 ms
max diff = 3.36909 ms (overrun 0)
within 1ms = 35446, factor = 99.9295%
within 2ms = 35471, factor = 100%
deviation = 0.033815
-----------------------------------------
The vanilla 2.6.5 has overruns here, bad against the others here.
Happy Easter all,
Marcus
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-09 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-09 21:47 Marcus Hartig [this message]
2004-04-11 8:27 ` 2.6.5 latencytest +aa5 +mm3 as/cfq scheduler Redeeman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-10 6:58 Marcus Hartig
2004-04-10 17:41 Marcus Hartig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407719E5.8050203@web.de \
--to=m.f.h@web.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.