From: Gianni Pucciani <gp.puccio@tin.it>
To: Netfilter <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: vpn under linux
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4077BEFF.4060902@tin.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404101018.38664.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Antony Stone wrote:
>On Saturday 10 April 2004 10:01 am, Gianni Pucciani wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>some of you can give me some input about the best way to set up a vpn
>>under two Linux RH9 systems?
>>I heared there are different solution (PPP and SSH, PPTP...) and I'd
>>like to know your opinion about that.
>>
>>
>
>PPP is Point-to-Point Protocol, and has almost nothing to do with VPNs :)
>
>SSH is Secure Shell, and at least it contains some encryption, but again, is
>almost nothing to do with VPNs (but more on that later).
>
>
I thought that they could be used in conjuction to achieve vpn
functionalities...
>PPTP is Pretty Poor Tunneling Protocol (oh, no, sorry, it's a Point to Point
>Tunneling Protocol...), and is the way Microsoft systems do VPN.
>
>The "standard" way to do VPN (in other words, the method which is supported by
>most vendors, uses open standards, and also has the best security) is IPsec.
>
>The usual way to do IPsec under Linux is to use FreeS/WAN under kernel 2.4, or
>the built-in IPsec under kernel 2.6.
>
>I use FreeS/WAN, I like it, it works well with netfilter (once you've got used
>to the path the packets take at each end), and I'm happy with its 3DES/RSA
>security.
>
>
Ok, I'll investigate this solution :-), thanks.
>I said I'd mention more about SSH - that also uses good encryption and is
>therefore secure, and once you have an SSH connection between two machines,
>you can "tunnel" almost any network traffic you like between them, and it
>does work, although I wouldn't select this as a first choice for a VPN
>because there's a lot more manual setting up involved. IPsec is more like a
>network route - you just configure it, and let the two endpoint machines get
>on with negotiating the link, and then computers from whichever network
>ranges you've configured the VPN to support can connect to each other
>transparently through a nice secure tunnel across the Internet.
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>
Sure it helps :-)
Thank you very much!
Gianni
>Regards,
>
>Antony.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-10 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-10 9:01 vpn under linux Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 9:18 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 9:31 ` Gianni Pucciani [this message]
2004-04-10 9:44 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 9:41 ` Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 10:00 ` Antony Stone
2004-04-10 10:15 ` Gianni Pucciani
2004-04-10 23:41 ` Alexander Samad
2004-04-11 0:09 ` Aaron P. Martinez
2004-04-12 12:25 ` Scott MacKay
2004-04-12 16:01 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-04-12 18:58 ` Dick St.Peters
2004-04-10 9:47 ` Victor Julien
2004-04-10 12:30 ` John A. Sullivan III
2004-04-10 17:23 ` Tony Earnshaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4077BEFF.4060902@tin.it \
--to=gp.puccio@tin.it \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.