From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Friedrich Lobenstock Subject: Re: latest pom: base/connlimit breaks kernel 2.4.25 compile (+possible fix) Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:00:34 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <4079B1F2.8020007@fl.priv.at> References: Reply-To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist In-Reply-To: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Henrik Nordstrom wrote on 11.04.2004 22:47 MET: > On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: > > >>>I think the core people wants a patch to what currently is in pom-ng, >>>replacing any earlier patches. >> >>Hmmmm....I am using plain pom, not pom-ng. So is this abandoned and not >>maintained anymore? > > > The development has fully switched over to pom-ng, and there will not be > any new versions of the older pom published from what I can understand. As far as I see there are still daily pom snapshots created so it can't be dead. > pom-ng contains a superset of the extensions which was found in pom. How about stability pom compared to pom-ng? It was "only" released the first time in March, so I think for the time beeing I will have to stay with good old "normal" pom. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock