From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Norman Zhang Subject: Re: Iptables and Kernel Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 23:27:43 -0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <407A36DF.40806@rd.arkonnetworks.com> References: <407A27B2.4000101@rd.arkonnetworks.com> <12755.3975828507$1081750103@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <12755.3975828507$1081750103@news.gmane.org> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org >>Is iptables still needed for kernel 2.6.x? I see a lot of iptables >>patches go into the kernel, but not much updates on the >>www.netfilter.org. The logo on netfilter says firewalling, NAT and >>packet mangling for Linux 2.4. So I guess much of the code goes directly >>into the kernel? Also does kernel 2.6.3 support Netmeeting and MSN >>Instant Messengener, or I need the following plug-in, >>http://www.kfki.hu/%7Ekadlec/sw/netfilter/newnat-suite/? > > 1) iptables is the userspace component. Yes it is still needed in 2.6.x -- you still have to use > it to setup and manage individual rules. > > 2) 2.6.x indeed supports many components of netfilter out of the box, however there is still > patch-o-matic-ng which can still add functionality not yet in the kernel or in userspace. > > 3) No, you do not need patches from newnat-suite by default, you need > ip_conntrack_h323 and ip_nat_h323, although you might need newnat if your iptables is really old. I'm using iptables-1.2.9-5mdk.i586.rpm on LM10.0. The latest on www.netfilter.org is 1.2.9. I guess those 2 modules is included in 1.2.9? > Keep in mind that *support* of netmeeting in this case is a loose terminology -- I believe that > several functionalities are not covered by the h323 patches. All I wanted is the ability to see video & audio for both incoming and outgoing calls. Is that supported in iptables-1.2.9? Do I need to apply pom-ng on top of iptables? Regards, Norman