From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S and entry.S
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:31:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <407AA848.2000008@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1081661150.1380.183.camel@gaston>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>You knew this was coming... What's special about syscalls? There's the
>>r3 thing, but other than that...
>
> The whole codepath is a bit different, there's the syscall trace,
> we can avoid saving much more registers are syscalls are function
> calls and so can clobber the non volatiles, etc...
It appears that we always enter the kernel via "transfer_to_handler",
and return via "ret_from_except". Is this true? (I'm running on at
least a 74xx chip.)
I want to insert two new bits of code, one that gets called before the
exception handler when we drop from userspace to kernelspace, and one as
late as possible before going back to userspace. I need to catch
syscalls, interrupts, exceptions, everything.
The entry one I planned on putting in "transfer_to_handler", just before
"addi r11,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD".
I was planning on putting the exit one just after the "restore_user"
label. Will this catch all possible returns to userspace?
Thanks,
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-12 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-10 7:41 want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S and entry.S Chris Friesen
2004-04-10 10:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-11 5:14 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-11 5:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-12 14:31 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2004-04-12 22:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-13 4:06 ` Chris Friesen
2004-04-15 15:24 ` Any hints on custom keyboard driver? Song Sam
2004-04-15 16:36 ` Brad Boyer
2004-04-16 6:18 ` Song Sam
2004-04-13 4:31 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S and entry.S Chris Friesen
2004-04-12 23:30 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions inhead.S " Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-12 15:01 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S " Chris Friesen
2004-04-11 6:00 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.Sand entry.S Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-11 5:45 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S and entry.S Chris Friesen
2004-04-13 15:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2004-04-13 15:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2004-04-10 10:30 ` want to clarify powerpc assembly conventions in head.S andentry.S Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=407AA848.2000008@nortelnetworks.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.