From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom Georgoulias <tom.georgoulias@motorola.com>
Subject: Re: To autofs4 or not
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:15:09 -0500
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <407FDC5D.4000000@motorola.com>
References: <C3CDA0E3AC8B4E438E94F37D0A20FE718D4581@HOUEXC210.mgroupnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <C3CDA0E3AC8B4E438E94F37D0A20FE718D4581@HOUEXC210.mgroupnet.com>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: autofs@linux.kernel.org

Rigler, Steve wrote:

> RHEL 3 includes the autofs4 module, but it is provided by the
> "kernel-unsupported" package.  Judging by bugzilla, people have
> been asking for support for the autofs4 daemon, but RH hasn't
> done anything (yet?) to include it in their distribution.

Judging by the recent patch submissions from Jeff Moyer at Red Hat, I'm 
guessing they're moving towards autofs4 now.  With any luck, we'll get 
good autofs4 support in RHEL sooner rather than later.

Tom
-- 
Tom Georgoulias
POPI Classification
[x] General Business Information
[] Motorola & freescale Internal Use
[] Motorola & freescale Confidential Proprietary