From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Miner <mine0057@mrs.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: "Metas"
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 15:44:40 -0500
Message-ID: <408045B8.7000102@mrs.umn.edu>
References: <20040416192014.32348.qmail@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18013-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20040416192014.32348.qmail@web25007.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

> 
> I don't think I've heard a single person, except Hans,
> voice any support for "metas".

I like "metas".

> 
> It seems that the most widely supported name thus far
> is "...".
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
> 

Maybe "props" would be a good name?  It is short for properties, which 
is synonymous with metadata and attributes (oops, I used a heretical 
word! :)