All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@virtall.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: compression disk space saving - what are your results?
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 18:46:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4082684905f25f921ae4564b1c8a892e@admin.virtall.com> (raw)

What are your disk space savings when using btrfs with compression?

I have a 200 GB btrfs filesystem which uses compress=zlib, only stores 
text files (logs), mostly multi-gigabyte files.


It's a "single" filesystem, so "df" output matches "btrfs fi df":

# df -h
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
(...)
/dev/xvdb       200G  124G   76G  62% /var/log/remote


# du -sh /var/log/remote/
153G    /var/log/remote/


 From these numbers (124 GB used where data size is 153 GB), it appears 
that we save around 20% with zlib compression enabled.
Is 20% reasonable saving for zlib? Typically text compresses much better 
with that algorithm, although I understand that we have several 
limitations when applying that on a filesystem level.


Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org


             reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-02  9:46 Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2015-12-02 10:36 ` compression disk space saving - what are your results? Duncan
2015-12-02 14:03   ` Imran Geriskovan
2015-12-02 14:39     ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-03  6:29       ` Duncan
2015-12-03 12:09         ` Imran Geriskovan
2015-12-04 12:33           ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-04 12:37         ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-02 13:03 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-02 13:53   ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2015-12-02 14:03     ` Wang Shilong
2015-12-02 14:06       ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2015-12-02 14:49     ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-12-22  3:55       ` Kai Krakow
2015-12-22 17:25         ` james northrup
2015-12-05 13:37 ` Marc Joliet
2015-12-05 14:11   ` Marc Joliet
2015-12-06  4:21     ` Duncan
2015-12-06 11:26       ` Marc Joliet
2015-12-05 19:38 ` guido_kuenne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4082684905f25f921ae4564b1c8a892e@admin.virtall.com \
    --to=tch@virtall.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.