From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damion de Soto Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:32:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing on a Bridge doesn't seen to work correct, Message-Id: <408461A7.9040104@snapgear.com> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Thomas Rei=DF wrote: > i tried to setup up a Linuxbridge for prioritize some interactive (Citrix= / https) Traffic to 1.2.3.4 on my ADSL Link, but i think it work not corre= ct. ---snip---- > 1) a big Download becomes never more than ~ 100kbit (the most times it = will be much lower). Why that ? > - Should it not have the speed of the Download Rate from the ingress qdis= q ? > - The ingress qdisq counter show 0 Packets send. Why isn't this work ? ---snip--- > I think i do something wrong, but can please anybody point my to the righ= t direction ? I couldn't make ingress policing work with bridges either. I just changed to egress shaping on both interfaces (since it's a gateway r= outer). I vaguely recall someone else discussing this on the list recently - can't = remember=20 what the result was though. --=20 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Damion de Soto - Software Engineer email: damion@snapgear.com SnapGear - A CyberGuard Company --- ph: +61 7 3435 2809 | Custom Embedded Solutions fax: +61 7 3891 3630 | and Security Appliances web: http://www.snapgear.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --- Free Embedded Linux Distro at http://www.snapgear.org --- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/