From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: viewprinting processes and process oriented permissions got funded by DARPA Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 08:26:53 -0700 Message-ID: <4085413D.4030007@namesys.com> References: <407C304F.4080804@namesys.com> <407C930D.5010407@namesys.com> <20040414022248.GA92870@colin2.muc.de> <20040414113741.GB15922@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <20040414125340.GA7737@colin2.muc.de> <20040414150052.GB19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <20040414152804.GA2180@colin2.muc.de> <20040414155342.GC19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <16510.30611.752735.235549@laputa.namesys.com> <407E7CBB.1020907@edsons.demon.nl> <407EFF68.2060900@namesys.com> <16511.46245.167983.848763@laputa.namesys.com> <4084B8C8.2070608@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <4084B8C8.2070608@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Nikita Danilov , "Rudy L. Zijlstra" , ReiserFS Hans Reiser wrote: > Nikita Danilov wrote: > >> Hans Reiser writes: >> > Is there a URL on King Arthur being Attila? This doesn't sound >> right to > me,;-) but of course, he who wins gets to speak the oral >> history.... >> >> Disgooglexic, eh? :) >> >> http://www.uwo.ca/english/florilegium/vol-xi/ridley.pdf >> >> Nikita. >> >> >> >> > Florence Ridley seems to typify the sort of literary analysis that > dominates western academia, and discredits it in the eyes of many > including me. > > Her style of analysis is far from scientifically rigorous. She > suggests that they are one not really because it is reasonable to > think that they are, but because it is provocative and truth has > little import for her kind. > > There is a whole cast of literary analysis professors who lack the > ability to produce literature themselves, and have a love for > literature that allows them to invent as they please when analyzing > it. Thus they love Henry James. > > > > Probably I forgot to take Nikita's remark in the good humor it was intended.;-)