From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "John D. Heintz" <jheintz@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: "Metas"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:42:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4086A487.7050500@pobox.com>
References: <35813986328-BeMail@cr593174-a> <407C1A80.2090207@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18128-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <407C1A80.2090207@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

How would we look up the current name of the "metas" pseudo directory? 
This affects tools (GUI, scripts) that would need to reliably find the 
"metas" pseudo directory regardless of renames.

If there is a good answer to this question I think I would be absolutely 
happy.

Thanks,
John D. Heintz


 >> -----Original Message-----
 >> From: Hans Reiser [mailto:reiser@namesys.com]
 >> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:18 AM
 >> To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
 >> Subject: Re: "Metas"
 >>
 >> so if rename works on metas, are you guys happy?  that is, if mv
 >> filename/metas filename/... works, are you less worried about the one

in

 >> 10 million users who will actually hit the reserved keyword?