All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Friedrich Lobenstock <fl@fl.priv.at>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: question regarding iptables tuning (was Re: iptables denial of services)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:44:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40882EB9.7090306@fl.priv.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040422122301.GC1211@eychenne.org>

Herve Eychenne wrote on 22.04.2004 14:23 MET:
> 
> I've checked, and the change in hash algorithm appeared in 2.4.21.
> I have updated the document accordingly.
> 
> Here is the new version:
> http://www.wallfire.org/misc/netfilter_conntrack_perf.txt
> 

Hmmmm....."Last changes on 12/02/2003" ?

PS: A BIG THANKS for that document. I has helped me a lot getting a better 
understanding of the matter.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-15 18:31 iptables denial of services Jorge Garcia
2004-04-16  7:10 ` Ozgur AKAN
2004-04-16 10:03 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-04-17 11:13   ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 16:49     ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-04-17 17:22       ` question regarding iptables tuning (was Re: iptables denial of services) Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 18:18         ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-04-17 18:53           ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 23:49             ` Henrik Nordstrom
2004-04-17 19:08         ` Pablo Neira
2004-04-17 19:58           ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 20:18             ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 20:33               ` Martin Josefsson
2004-04-17 20:41                 ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-17 20:58                   ` Martin Josefsson
2004-04-17 21:13                     ` Friedrich Lobenstock
2004-04-22 12:23                     ` Herve Eychenne
2004-04-22 20:44                       ` Friedrich Lobenstock [this message]
2004-04-18 12:55             ` Tarek W.
2004-04-18 13:29             ` Tarek W.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40882EB9.7090306@fl.priv.at \
    --to=fl@fl.priv.at \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.