From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4089131D.5040905@interActive-Systems.de> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:59:09 +0200 From: Edin Dizdarevic MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Street Cc: SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: Local LUG Presentation References: <20040423124723.B6FA23A404F@abyss.simplyaquatics.com> In-Reply-To: <20040423124723.B6FA23A404F@abyss.simplyaquatics.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hi, I don't even want to think of beginning thinking in terms of "us" and "them" ;) . If we stick to facts why there should be a problem in formulating some kind of technically based discussion, which has almost always been constitutional in similar cases before. So everybody can build his/her opinion. Sitting things out leaves some kind of vacuum. At least for me. Fact is: More and more distribution will come up with LSM more or less activated. So these questions have to be answered, if we or them want it or not. Just my 2c. Regards, Edin Ed Street schrieb: > Hello, > > Yes these text boxes are available. As for the comments on those 2 site I > guess the official response is no comment :) We are not forcing them to use > lsm. > > Ed -- Edin Dizdarevic -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.