From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reinstantiating stale inodes Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:04:30 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <40893E8E.2000903@RedHat.com> References: <40892507.2030004@RedHat.com> <40892DC0.1010001@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BH39z-0003sz-3N for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:04:15 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1BH39y-0002mg-NQ for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:04:14 -0700 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3NG4DKG018603 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:04:13 -0400 To: Neil Horman In-Reply-To: <40892DC0.1010001@redhat.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Neil Horman wrote: > Should ENOMEM be whats returned in the event that we don't get a file > handle after we refresh the directory? Shouldn't that be ENOENT? It really matter since the original ESTALE error will be returned if any part of the lookup fails... SteveD. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs