From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reinstantiating stale inodes Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:27:46 -0400 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <40894402.4060302@RedHat.com> References: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435DF51@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.12] helo=sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BH3WZ-00014h-LO for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:27:35 -0700 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]) by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.30) id 1BH3WV-00087l-2B for nfs@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:27:31 -0700 To: "Lever, Charles" In-Reply-To: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C61130435DF51@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com> Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Lever, Charles wrote: >so you need to invalidate all the cached pages for this inode >explicitly. nfs_refresh_inode will not detect any change in >mtime or i_size so it will not do this for you. > > Yes I tried invaliding the caches using both nfs_zap_caches() and NFS_CACHEINV()... but just took care of some the ESTALEs in a very random way... SteveD. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs