Re: [somewhat OT] binary modules agaaaain

["Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" <filia@softhome.net>]

Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> I came across an idea, how Linux could allow binary modules, still having
> reasonable control over them.
> 
> I am not advocating for binary modules, nor I am trying to make their life
> harder, this is just an idea how it could be done.
> 
> I'll try to make it short, details may be discussed later, if any interest
> arises.
> 
> A binary module is "considered good" if
> 

   I belive that you forgot to make "The Point."

   And "discussion" (good vs. bad isn't discussion, but flames) went in 
wrong direction.

   Be constructive. For example: Let's aks h/w producers making at least 
glue layer open source (bsd or something), so people eventually might 
help to maintain this glue layer.
   How it can help? - producer with time may move bigger parts of driver 
into open source domains.
   How it can gets screwed? - producer might just start liking when 
someone is doing his work for him. Some license a-la GPL to not let glue 
layer to slip into binary only domain back must be in place.

   This could be a good starting point for h/w producers and linux 
comunity as a whole.

   Saying Good/Bad is just B.S. - helps no-one.
   Building bridges between comunity and producers - might improve and 
deepen relationships. And that's what I hope for.

P.S. nVidia driver might be an example: IIRC nVidia engineers were 
saying that they have four 2/3rd party code parts inside driver, which 
they are not able to open source/GPL. But open source glue layer to 
connect this "tainted" 4 parts with Linux kernel might help everyone: 
nVidia, LK and even those four companies. At least I hope for this.