From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Ivan Hawkes Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 13:06:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] boring question Message-Id: <408BB7D6.9080608@ivanhawkes.com> List-Id: References: <20040422214238.8E57A44CB@outpost.ds9a.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040422214238.8E57A44CB@outpost.ds9a.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Andy Furniss wrote: > Mr Ivan Hawkes wrote: > >> It is important to note that this generally works well for outgoing >> traffic but is not particularly effective against incoming traffic >> since that is *pushed* onto your machine and it has no way to control >> this. > > > You can control incoming bandwidth much the same as outbound - but it's > hard to keep latency low all of the time. > > Andy. > > Are you able to selectively control incoming bandwidth? e.g. I have some BT's running sucking up all that good bandwidth and my incoming pipe gets saturated (it's 2MB, so this doesn't generally happen). How would I tell the BT streams to slow down while giving more priority to the important stuff? I know how to do it on egress, just not on ingress. -- http://www.ivanhawkes.com | ICQ: 173-392-038 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/