From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Connections to portmapper over TCP
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:26:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <408D384E.80702@pbl.ca> (raw)
Hi,
I've stumbled accross one interesting problem with portmapper. I have
rules to allow connections to portmapper. The connection goes through
three way handshake, however as soon as handshake is over, packets are
being dropped by Netfiler.
The relevant rules on host named "client" look something like this
(edited a bit for clarity):
/sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp -s client --sport 0:1023
-d server --dport sunrpc
-o eth0 -m rpc --rpcs list_of_services -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p udp -s server --sport sunrpc
-d client --dport 0:1023
-i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -s client --sport 0:1023
-d server --dport sunrpc
-o eth0 -m rpc --rpcs list_of_services -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s server --sport sunrpc
-d client --dport 0:1023
-i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
So, this should allow for both TCP and UDP connections to portmapper on
host "server". It should also allow me to allow only connections to
specified RPC services in subsequent rules. Well, UDP part works. But
TCP doesn't work exactly as expected.
I've added some logging rules that will log all portmapper packets with
either "RPC UDP" or "RPC TCP" prefix, and placed them before above
mentioned rules. Also added logging rules that will log dropped packets
with "OUTPUT" or "INPUT" prefix (depending in which chain they were
dropped) and placed them at the very end of my rules, just before the
unmatched packets are dropped by default policy.
What I can see from log files is that three way handshake goes well.
Edited and formated a bit for clarity:
RPC TCP IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=client DST=server
LEN=60 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=11551 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=690 DPT=111 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
RPC TCP IN=eth0 OUT= SRC=server DST=client
LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=12081 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=111 DPT=690 WINDOW=33304 RES=0x00 ACK SYN URGP=0
RPC TCP IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=client DST=server
LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=49320 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=690 DPT=111 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 ACK URGP=0
However, all subsequent packets are being dropped (this two lines are
for the same packet, logged as it entered the chain, and again just
before it was dropped by default policy):
RPC TCP IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=client DST=server
LEN=96 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=25452 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=690 DPT=111 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0
OUTPUT IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=client DST=server
LEN=96 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=25452 DF
PROTO=TCP SPT=690 DPT=111 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 ACK PSH URGP=0
The above two lines are repeating several times, until client gives up.
After that, client fails over to UDP, and from that point on
everything works as expected.
Using tcpdump basically gives same information (I can see three way
handshake going on the wire, and after it there's silence).
I've tried adding "-m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED" to the third line
of my rules (the one allowing outgoing TCP portmapper requests). And
got same results. For some reason, Netfilter "forgets" that there's
established connection between cilent and server, and simply starts to
drop packets.
Has anybody else run across this problem? Or am I doing something
obviously wrong? I've tried digging around in documentation, Googling,
experimenting, always with the same end result.
--
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca> Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator 1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276 Winnipeg, MB R3T 1L7
reply other threads:[~2004-04-26 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=408D384E.80702@pbl.ca \
--to=amilivojevic@pbl.ca \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.