From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional
 namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:58:26 -0700
Message-ID: <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com>
References: <1082750045.12989.199.camel@watt.suse.com> <408D3FEE.1030603@namesys.com> <20040426203314.A6973@infradead.org> <408E986F.90506@namesys.com> <20040427183400.A20221@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18252-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20040427183400.A20221@infradead.org>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, akpm@osdl.org

Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>>Did you notice that V4 blows XFS and ReiserFS V3 away in benchmarks?    
>>That is what I have been doing for 3 years....
>>
>>See www.namesys.com for details.
>>    
>>
>
>see www.microsoft.com why Windows is much better than Linux.  Yeah, thanks.
>  
>
Ask the users whether their laptops, etc.,  seem to go a lot faster with 
V4.  They seem to be pretty happy with it.

V4 fixed all of V3's serious performance flaws, and totally obsoletes 
it.    I am very happy with it.