From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free? Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 23:53:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4096BF41.5070103@gmx.net> References: <4da7d13f5c1085a6bc4242656377becf@bouncing.localnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <4da7d13f5c1085a6bc4242656377becf@bouncing.localnet> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: MJ Ray Cc: Hans Reiser , debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com MJ Ray wrote: [at least 3 insults snipped] >>> Surely there is! If we (or RedHat) were to do such a thing, our very >>> users and developers would be quite vocal about it, and rightly so. > > On 2004-05-02 22:02:38 +0100 Hans Reiser wrote: >> >> They did it and nothing happened to them (except of course that >> XFree86 4.0 changed its license, which is the only way developers can >> effectively respond to such conduct). > > OK, so say RedHat did bad. I don't use RedHat for years, which is the > only way users can effectively respond. I plan to stop using XFree86 > because of its dumb developers who won't answer simple questions about ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Hey, can you do anything else but insult people? > the licence. I already don't use ReiserFS any more. That's your right. Nobody has disputed that. Carl-Daniel