From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free?
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 09:20:56 -0700
Message-ID: <4097C2E8.2030409@namesys.com>
References: <13518599fb1119aa327235ecc3e01dc7@bouncing.localnet> <40974BB9.1000509@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18432-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <40974BB9.1000509@gmx.net>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2004@gmx.net>
Cc: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:

>
>  
>
>>It seems an apt description of how some XFree86 developers reacted to
>>questions. They went dumb. Other XFree86 developers were helpful, but
>>they are not the reason I plan to stop using it, so I do not blame them.
>>    
>>
I understand why they lost interest in talking to persons who cannot 
grasp that distros removed mention of them from their man pages and this 
was wrong.

I sent them a thanks for being brave enough to take on the task of 
changing licensing mores and forcing distros to attribute, and I got a 
response.;-)

Hans