From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Blandford <mlblandf@sedona.ch.intel.com>
Subject: Re: An offer to host autofs.org
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 11:26:35 -0700
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <4097E05B.7060000@sedona.intel.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405032046130.3257@donald.themaw.net>
	<4097DB47.2050603@zytor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4097DB47.2050603@zytor.com>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>, raven@themaw.net

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> I have several objections to this proposal.
>
> First of all, I still want the full autofs rewrite -- autofs 5 -- done 
> at some point, and I think this infrastructure would be in the way.
>
Can you elaborate on why you feel like it would be in the way?

Michael


Disclaimer: The content of this message is my personal opinion only and 
although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way 
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on 
behalf of Intel on this matter.