From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Georgoulias Subject: Re: mount point created if automount map is empty during daemon startup? Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 15:41:20 -0500 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <4097FFF0.5020206@freescale.com> References: <20040504010928.GL14889@sun.com> <20040503175506.GA14889@sun.com> <20040504003214.GA31852@neu.nirvana> <20040504122536.GK5041@neu.nirvana> <4097AABF.5050709@freescale.com> <16535.45364.767370.38110@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <4097B8CF.9050104@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: raven@themaw.net Cc: autofs mailing list raven@themaw.net wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2004, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > > >>raven@themaw.net wrote: >> >> >>>Saw that patch. Was a bit curious about it. Didn't add it. >> >>And it sounds like I ought to remove it, too. :) >> >>Judging by your test results on an empty map, an upgrade to 4.1.2 is in >>order. Thanks for checking in to that, I appreciate it. I'll start >>working on getting out a new build of autofs to my systems. 4.1.3 is >>just around the corner, right? >> > > > Yes. > > Yet another bug fix release. > > Not much in it. > > CHANGELOG so far: > > xx/xx/2004 autofs-4.1.3 > ----------------------- > - fixed bug processing --verbose option in init scripts. > - added missing parameter in call to run fsck on ext2 module (from Jeff > Moyer). > - added check for executable existance in getldapmounts in init script. > - updated comment about option handling in getmounts in init script. > - updated kernel module patches. > - fix to init script for reload option. > - autofs now requires autoconf later than 2.5 > > Plus the replicated server patch I'm currently working on and another > kernel module patch update. > > I think that will be it for 4.1.3 as the kernel module patches need to be > updated due to corrections. Should I wait for the kernel module patches or just go ahead with testing? I have set aside a Red Hat 8 system to test out the latest patches you have written and want to be sure I make this test as productive as possible for all. I'm looking at either running the autofs 4.1.2 plus patches from kernel.org, or Jeff Moyer's latest RPM, 4.1.2-5, and using either the 04172004 kernel module patch or waiting for a new one. Tom -- Tom Georgoulias POPI Classification [x] General Business Information [] Freescale Semiconductor Internal Use [] Freescale Semiconductor Confidential Proprietary