From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>
Subject: Re: IPSec - IPTables issues
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 11:12:32 -0500
Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
Message-ID: <40991270.5030803@pbl.ca>
References: <20040502155538.GD515@schottelius.org> <20040504211557.GA236@schottelius.org> <4098FE7A.8070707@pbl.ca> <200405051622.26944.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <200405051622.26944.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Antony Stone wrote:
> That's the way FreeS/WAN does it.

Yes, I know that's the way FreeS/WAN implements it.  But it doesn't mean 
  it is the only way it can be implemented.  Actually, I like better 
Linux 2.6 implementation that doesn't use virtual devices.

-- 
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>    Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator                           1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276                     Winnipeg, MB  R3T 1L7