From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Blandford Subject: Re: Please help - cleanup Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:45:37 -0700 Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: <40997CA1.2070904@sedona.intel.com> References: <16535.44980.475389.900686@segfault.boston.redhat.com> <16537.26586.135188.997029@segfault.boston.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <16537.26586.135188.997029@segfault.boston.redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: jmoyer@redhat.com Cc: autofs mailing list Jeff Moyer wrote: >==> Regarding Re: [autofs] Please help - cleanup; raven@themaw.net adds: > >[snip] >raven> If anyone is able to test this also that would be great. > > >>>I will roll another test rpm with this patch and post to my people page. >>> >>> > >Has anyone had the chance to test this? autofs-4.1.2-5 from my people >page, or the patch Ian sent to the list? I'd like to hear feedback, either >positive or negative as I have to push a package into FC2 before the >freeze on Friday. > > > I have not had a chance to play with it extensively. I will dedicate time to it tomorrow. Just a couple of questions 1) What about the get-best-mount.patch? My impression was it wasn't needed with the new replicated server patch. 2) What kernel modules are you going to add to the kernel? Is it the 20040417 ( for 2.6 ) or are you going to wait for the newest ones from Ian? 3) Are you going to add your yp patch to your rpm? Michael Disclaimer: The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter.