From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Turley Subject: Re: IPSec - IPTables issues Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 19:21:07 -0500 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <409984F3.80805@rocksteady.com> References: <20040502155538.GD515@schottelius.org> <4096317F.8020609@eurodev.net> <20040504211557.GA236@schottelius.org> <4098FE7A.8070707@pbl.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4098FE7A.8070707@pbl.ca> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > Nico Schottelius wrote: > >> I'll compare what freeswan did with what Linux 2.6 does now: >> [... many interesting facts...] I'm reading this thread with great interest and I'm curious about the new implementation. Specificaly, does anyone know if the firewall marks on packets are preserved after they are encrypted?