All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mogens Valentin <monz@danbbs.dk>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ultra160 controller on 32bit pci
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:51:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <409A5F05.A7FA9935@danbbs.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040506152923.GB2281@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:15:04AM +0200, Mogens Valentin wrote:
> > Currently using Adaptec 29160, works fine, but it's only 160/2, after
> > all.
> > I'm curious if other controllers can provide better performance when
> > used on a 32bit pci bus?
> 
> Theoretical bandwidth on a 33MHz 32-bit PCI bus is around 132MB/s.
> In practice you never attain that because of overhead in turning the bus
> around and typical figures quoted in the PCI spec are between 60-107MB/s.
> So you already saturated the PCI bus (never mind what else you have on
> that bus).

I'm aware of that. I have a 40MHz pci bus, no problems with any devices
(most modern cards are build for 66MHz anyway), so I'm interested in
scsi controllers possible utilising a 32bit interface better (than the
29160).
Haven't seen any though, thus the question.

> > In a few month I might switch to a pci-express/opteron setup, so I'd
> > like some indication about controllers for that bus.
> 
> Depends what people are going to ship.  I've heard rumours the initial
> chipsets will have an x16 link for graphics and an x4 link for other I/O.

Yes, a few such boards already exist. No matter which combinations will
be on boards, I'll be happy with on x16 slot for video and one
x-whatever for a scsi controller.

Thanks for replying..

-- 
Kind regards,
Mogens Valentin
Networking, Security
www.danbbs.dk/~monz
Phone +45 32 525 878

      reply	other threads:[~2004-05-06 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-06  8:15 Ultra160 controller on 32bit pci Mogens Valentin
2004-05-06 15:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-05-06 15:51   ` Mogens Valentin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=409A5F05.A7FA9935@danbbs.dk \
    --to=monz@danbbs.dk \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.