From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Blandford <mlblandf@sedona.ch.intel.com>
Subject: Status of >800 mounts
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 10:48:44 -0700
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <409A7A7C.2000109@sedona.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>

Hello,

What is the current status of having more than 800 nfs mounts ( on 2.4 
and 2.6 )?

I had heard there might be a patch to use one port per server instead of 
per mount. 

Thanks,

Michael


Disclaimer: The content of this message is my personal opinion only and 
although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way 
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on 
behalf of Intel on this matter.