From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 non-free? Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 11:59:23 -0700 Message-ID: <409A8B0B.2000603@namesys.com> References: <4097CCA4.4060707@namesys.com> <87fzag139k.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <4099A868.9030406@slaphack.com> <20040506.083242.41632888.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <87k6zpy8ke.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <20040506143643.GB25505@raptus.homelinux.org> <877jvpy08v.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <877jvpy08v.fsf@aule.evenmere.org> <409A7F98.7040609@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Matthew Garrett Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Matthew Garrett wrote: >Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>The License: The Anti-plagiarism license is the Gnu Public License Version 2 >>with the following modification: you may not modify, remove, or obscure any >>credits in the software unless your modification causes those credits to >>remain >>equally prominent and to retain their wording. You are not required to >>display >>the credits if the computer has no effective display mechanism, or if >>you do not >>distribute the software to others. >> >> > >Ok, that's a restriction that's not present in the GPL version 2 >(otherwise it wouldn't be necessary). Section 6 of the GPL says: > > 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the >Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the >original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to >these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further >restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. >You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to >this License. > >Which means that code under the Anti-plagiarism license is not GPL >compatible, since it imposes further restrictions. This would prevent >anyone from distributing it with their kernel. In order for it to be >distributable at all, you'd also need to demonstrate that it isn't a >derivative work of the Linux kernel. > > The kernel portion is GPL V2, this is the progs license.....