From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Renzmann Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:04:14 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Contact for iptables-extension "ipp2p"? Message-Id: <409F539E.20801@otaku42.de> List-Id: References: <409F11C5.2020203@otaku42.de> In-Reply-To: <409F11C5.2020203@otaku42.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi Andreas. Andreas Klauer wrote: > However, I also found two other projects which are pretty much capable of > the same thing: iptables-p2p and l7-filter (both on Sourceforge). However, > I haven't had the time for a closer look yet, so I don't know if they are > any good. I also found them before choosing ipp2p. But l7-filter is for kernel 2.6 only, and iptables-p2p seemed to be idle. So I decided to use ipp2p. >>Question: is the contact address that is mentioned on the project >>website still correct? If not, who should I contact? > No idea - but not everyone reads his/her mail every day, so you probably > should be more patient. Two weeks is not much time, especially if the > author has to review a patch you wrote. I file some bug reports here and > there (which should be read by more than one person only) and even there > it sometimes takes months until I get a reply. I know that people might be quite busy - I have the same problem. I was just wondering if I took the wrong e-mail address, since answers to questions regarding ipp2p here on the list have been answered very quickly as far as I remember. Well, didn't meant to cause any trouble - just been curious. :) Bye, Mike _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/