From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 non-free?
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 10:53:48 -0700
Message-ID: <40A1132C.8050409@namesys.com>
References: <3DF9165145FACB4C96977FF650C1E9040C469F87@its-mail1.its.corp.gwl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18614-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <3DF9165145FACB4C96977FF650C1E9040C469F87@its-mail1.its.corp.gwl.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: "Burnes, James" <james.burnes@gwl.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, ed@debian.org, cavok@debian.org

Burnes, James wrote:

>Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes, I believe that, and that is my concern.
>>    
>>
>
>I can understand that.  That's why I'm working on the 'creditsd'
>infrastructure.  Decoupling the credit content from the visual aspect of
>the program's performance makes the following possible...
>
>  
>
My main concern is how you make the credits not annoying.  Making them 
relevant is a big part of making them not annoying, or at least I think 
that is an advantage of displaying them on program entry (which for 
reiser4 is mkreiser4 invocation or boot (I chose mkreiser4 time instead 
of boot time because distros have all thoroughly monopolized the credits 
at boot time).