From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: plugin for cached network file system Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:09:43 -0700 Message-ID: <40A39DC7.5040305@namesys.com> References: <200405131059.22693.Michael.James@csiro.au> <40A30C53.3020607@namesys.com> <200405131653.52862.Michael.James@csiro.au> <20040513070355.GQ29226@nysv.org> <20040513092106.57690c70.turtle.power@wanadoo.es> <20040513072420.GR29226@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <20040513072420.GR29226@nysv.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_T=F6rnqvist?= Cc: Miguel , Michael James , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote: >On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:21:06AM +0200, Miguel wrote: > > =20 > >>wow the problem here maybe to find a hat with 1.8million dollar capacity >> =20 >> > >Getting the bugger bootstrapped may require less money. > > =20 > There are pleny of people working on cluster file systems. Their stuff=20 does not scale globally, it all scales to single machine room only. I=20 would like to address this problem, but only if well funded enough to=20 win the competition.