From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOg1V-0005W3-6Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:59:01 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOg0v-0005K1-5e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:58:57 -0400 Received: from [194.228.2.91] (helo=smtp-out3.iol.cz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOg0u-0005JJ-9A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:58:24 -0400 Received: from [62.177.71.163] (prahaa-2-54.dialup.vol.cz [62.177.71.163]) by smtp-out3.iol.cz (Internet on Line ESMP server) with ESMTP id 0956C370D1 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 18:58:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40A4FAB0.6000507@volny.cz> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:58:24 +0200 From: Filip Navara MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU Video Driver for Win NT-based systems References: <40A13BFD.3010709@volny.cz> <200405121001.56247.jm@poure.com> <40A1F6D6.9090609@volny.cz> <000601c43814$7c5a2380$5500a8c0@shaggy> <20040512174908.01420955.iosglpgc@teleline.es> <001401c43852$3e9ae9b0$5500a8c0@shaggy> <20040512212914.685d9f1b.iosglpgc@teleline.es> <40A297CD.1020500@volny.cz> <20040513045620.731580ef.iosglpgc@teleline.es> <40A3297A.6080407@volny.cz> <000e01c438d0$919942f0$5500a8c0@shaggy> <20040514162128.03e7701f.iosglpgc@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: <20040514162128.03e7701f.iosglpgc@teleline.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org That's matter of the drivers. The nVidia Detonator drivers have the GDI accelerated functions of course. - Filip Natalia Portillo wrote: >I don't think the nVidia GeForce FX has GDI acceleration. > >So how is it accelereting 2D applications (not games, so GDI not DirectDraw) in Windows 95? > >On Thu, 13 May 2004 10:56:30 +0100 >Jamie Burns wrote: > > > >>I double that. GDI and DirectDraw are different things. >> >>Nearly all cards have for some years supported *both* GDI acceleration (from >>Windows 3.1 days...) and DirectDraw acceleration (from Windows 95 days...). >>Although they support both, they are different sets of code for different >>purposes. >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Filip Navara" >>To: >>Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:53 AM >>Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU Video Driver for Win NT-based systems >> >> >> >> >>>Natalia Portillo wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Then, why do you require DirectDraw support for activating acceleration? >>>>Is simply. >>>> >>>>When no acceleration is, the GDI calls are rendered manually, when it is >>>> >>>> >>activated, they are rendered through DirectDraw. >> >> >>>> >>>> >>>No they aren't. Please trust me on this, I know quite a bit of details >>>of the Windows NT (and 9x also) architecture and this is just not true. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/graphics/hh/graphics/dispvid_2003_7z53.asp >> >> >>>- Filip >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Qemu-devel mailing list >>>Qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Qemu-devel mailing list >>Qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel >> >> > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Qemu-devel mailing list >Qemu-devel@nongnu.org >http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > > > >