From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: SATA ATAPI work in progress
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 14:38:58 -0400
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <40A51242.6070001@pobox.com>
References: <1084393233.3999.2.camel@patibmrh9> <40A28BB6.7090204@pobox.com>	<1084403654.3196.31.camel@patibmrh9>  <40A3E595.8000003@pobox.com> <1084559309.4017.59.camel@patibmrh9>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:58549 "EHLO
	www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262051AbUENSjL
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 14 May 2004 14:39:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1084559309.4017.59.camel@patibmrh9>
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Pat LaVarre <p.lavarre@ieee.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Pat LaVarre wrote:
> Are we agreed that this bcl is the max permissible byte count for a PIO
> DRQ, distinct from the actual byte count of a PIO DRQ?


Yes, agreed.

	Jeff