All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: berk walker <berk.walker@verizon.net>
To: John Lange <john.lange@bighostbox.com>
Cc: LinuxRaid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Hard drive Reliability?
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 18:04:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40ABD9E4.8060600@verizon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084996693.4021.8.camel@ws101.darkcore.net>

I know a guy with a box of dead WDs, and I have 3 out of 5 bad Maxtor 
40Gb. drives

John Lange wrote:

>I have a few discussions recently with technical service people and we
>all come to the conclusion that Hard Drives are far less reliable than
>they used to be.
>
>Case in point, I have a 120G Maxtor drive in a server that began to fail
>less than 8 months into service. Major headache.
>
>I've heard similar stories from other people. I guy I know that sells
>both desktop and file server systems now says he now only builds
>motherboards with some kind of RAID 1 and dual drives because drives
>fail so often this saves loads of headaches. After a their system has
>died and they 'lost everything' people are more than willing to pay the
>extra $150 for redundancy.
>
>I know drive manufactures were sued recently in a class action for
>shipping drives which they knew were going to fail prematurely but that
>was a few years back.
>
>So what are other peoples feelings about drive reliability and are some
>brands better than others?
>
>Does anyone know of any web sites with statistics or test data?
>
>  
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-19 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-19 19:58 Hard drive Reliability? John Lange
2004-05-19 20:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 21:28   ` Sevatio
2004-05-19 22:02     ` John Lange
2004-05-19 22:42       ` jim
2004-05-19 22:26     ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:53       ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20  0:49         ` TJ Harrell
2004-05-20  1:13           ` berk walker
2004-05-20  6:39           ` Måns Rullgård
2004-05-19 23:44     ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-19 22:04 ` berk walker [this message]
2004-05-19 22:18 ` Guy
2004-05-19 23:40   ` maarten van den Berg
2004-05-20  0:34     ` Guy
2004-05-20  1:46       ` John Lange
2004-05-20 22:27       ` Russ Price
2004-05-20 15:51     ` Sevatio
2004-05-20  4:39 ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20  7:15   ` John Lange
2004-05-20 12:15     ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:26       ` jim
2004-05-20 13:31       ` John Lange
2004-05-20 14:20         ` Mark Hahn
2004-05-20 13:32       ` Tim Grant
2004-05-20 14:38         ` Robin Bowes
2004-05-22  5:15           ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 13:25             ` Frank van Maarseveen
2004-05-24 18:35               ` Brad Campbell
2004-05-24 22:38                 ` maarten van den Berg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-20 13:54 Cress, Andrew R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40ABD9E4.8060600@verizon.net \
    --to=berk.walker@verizon.net \
    --cc=john.lange@bighostbox.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.