From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 22:18:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040511125405.GA14578@linux-sh.org>
Paul Mundt wrote:
> Presently 2.6.6 backs out the CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX in favor of using a
> hardcoded 8139_RXBUF_IDX (again). This seems to have been done due to
> some issues occuring with 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 3, however (as the Kconfig
> pointed out), we still need 8139_RXBUF_IDX == 1 in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> case.
>
> The patch which made this change can be seen at:
>
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/user=shemminger/cset@1.1371.719.67?nav=!-|index.html|stats|!+|index.html|ChangeSet@-8w
>
> Before that, CONFIG_8139_RXBUF_IDX was set to 1 both in the CONFIG_SH_DREAMCAST
> and CONFIG_EMBEDDED cases. This patch adds that back into the current 8139too.
Patch applied to 2.6.x.
> Additionally, why remove the config option at all? Wouldn't it just be
> easier to drop the range from 0 - 3 to 0 - 2 until problems with a 64K ring
> size are resolved?
<shrug> Mainly it was easier just to hardcode it in the driver.
I would not object to your suggestion of "0 - 2", however I tend to
think that the current lack of option, with your patch applied, serves
the user best: the driver will always use the largest RX buffer
possible for the hardware.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-20 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-11 12:54 [PATCH] Fix 8139too ring size for dreamcast/embedded Paul Mundt
2004-05-20 2:18 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40AC1580.6090401@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.