All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Kujau <evil@g-house.de>
To: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `dssall'
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 23:23:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40AE734D.1020609@g-house.de> (raw)


hi,

i'm successfully using a crosstoolchain to compile gcc+binutils on i386
to make targets for powerpc-linux. upon "upgrading" the toolchain new
sources for gcc+binutils were fetched and now kernel-compilation fails
as follows:

-----------
   CHK     include/asm-ppc/offsets.h
*** 2.6 kernels no longer buildcorrectly with old versions of binutils.
*** Please upgrade your binutils to 2.12.1 or newer
make: *** [checkbin] Error 1
-----------

there is a check in arch/ppc/Makefile:

-----------
# Ensure this is binutils 2.12.1 (or 2.12.90.0.7) or later
NEW_AS  := $(shell echo dssall | $(AS) -o /dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 ; \
echo $$?)
-----------

i don't really know what "dssall" is, but obviously it should be a valid
input for "as". now, please see the following:

-----------
/usr/local/opt/crosstool_new/bin/powerpc-linux-as --version
GNU assembler 2.14.92 20040507
This assembler was configured for a target of `powerpc-linux'.

/usr/local/opt/crosstool_old/bin/powerpc-linux-as --version
GNU assembler 2.14 20030612
This assembler was configured for a target of `powerpc-linux'.
-----------
(copyright notes removed), both versions of "as" seem to be in place.
but testing "dssall" gives indeed:

-----------
echo dssall | /usr/local/opt/crosstool_new/bin/powerpc-linux-as
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:1: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `dssall'

echo dssall | /usr/local/opt/crosstool_old/bin/powerpc-linux-as
[no message, so it's OK]
-----------


ok, i guess you get the picture. now, this "dssall" appears several
times under arch/ppc, so the real kernel compile fails. what i seek to
understand is: "as" comes with "binutils", but there was only a minor
upgrade in binutils, i somehow expected some brokenness from the new
gcc-3.4 (sorry gcc folks, really...).

perhaps you have some thoughts on it....
i'll go on with different binutils now...


Thanks,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #193:

Did you pay the new Support Fee?

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-21 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-21 21:23 Christian Kujau [this message]
2004-05-25 22:21 ` Error: Unrecognized opcode: `dssall' Christian Kujau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40AE734D.1020609@g-house.de \
    --to=evil@g-house.de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.