All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian <evil@g-house.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@osdl.org
Subject: tarballs of patchsets?
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:15:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B21F98.1080803@g-house.de> (raw)

hi,

i am trying to chase some bug and i know, it must be somewhere between 2.6.4 and 
2.6.5. the 2.6.5 patch is 7.0 MB (unpacked). although i am pretty sure the lines 
starting with "diff -Nru a/Documentation" do seem to be involved with the issue, 
i am not a programmer and often have to use brute-force methods as described in 
"BUG-HUNTING". that said, i'd like to know, if there is a possibility to find 
out the different sets that generated this "patch-2.6.5.bz2".

correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't it like:
   - $scsi-maintainer sent in these patches
   - $ppc_maintainer sent in those patches
   - fix from author_x
   - more fixes from author_y

and then this whole thing is cat'ed altogether to the very patch-file.bz2?
could one compile a tar.[bz2|gz] from the patch-sets, before putting it into one 
large patch-file?

hm, maybe it's done in another way.
the thing is: even when i say: "hm, this is a ppc issue, so i'll cut out all 
diff's touching arch/ppc/ (i.e. from "$ppc_maintainer") -> the kernel might not 
compile then, and i have to wait until compilation is almost finished, just to 
find out that something under drivers/char was referencing a change in arch/ppc.

when i could know "oh, the guy who changed arch/ppc also touched drivers/char", 
i would cut out _both_ and the kernel would at least compile.

perhaps the whole process of releasing a patch is way more complex than i think 
here, but perhaps someone has some thoughts on it. just now compilation of 
2.5.6-rc1 failed. i hoped it would at least compile, because it's "only" 4MB to 
search for the bug then.

Thank you,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #9:

doppler effect

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-24 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-24 16:15 Christian [this message]
2004-05-24 16:33 ` tarballs of patchsets? Christian
2004-05-24 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-24 22:02   ` Christian
2004-05-25 16:02   ` Andy Isaacson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40B21F98.1080803@g-house.de \
    --to=evil@g-house.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.