From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <40B4260E.5040208@snu.edu> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 00:07:26 -0500 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Babcock CC: SELinux Subject: Re: 32bit / 64bit support References: <1600.172.16.17.10.1085534896.squirrel@mxlx1.surveysavvy.com> In-Reply-To: <1600.172.16.17.10.1085534896.squirrel@mxlx1.surveysavvy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Chris Babcock wrote: > Is anybody still working on making selinux work on sparc64? > The new SELinux API is totally arch independant. I've run SELinux on sparc64 (a blade 2000) on and off since the new API was introduced with no problems. It shouldn't be any different to get it running on sparc64 than any other arch. > Is x86_64 any better off than sparc64 for running selinux? > neither should be a problem at all Joshua Brindle -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.