From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT1xR-0004Ou-6P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:12:49 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BT1uw-00041g-K8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 13:10:46 -0400 Received: from [195.9.147.9] (helo=dionis.simtreas.ru) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BSz3t-00067n-GD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 May 2004 10:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: <40B4A526.10807@simtreas.ru> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 18:09:42 +0400 From: "Vladimir N. Oleynik" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: AIO ide patch References: <40B37520.7020807@simtreas.ru> <40B47992.8080307@simtreas.ru> <40B4AC26.8050002@witch.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <40B4AC26.8050002@witch.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hetz Ben Hamo Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hetz, >> Good news: with this second variant patch installation w2k is full true >> and don`t make disk full! >> From second variant I moved set_irq() to thread. >> But, I don`t know: this save or not, but all my test cleans. > And where is the patch? :) I want see Fabrice a reaction. I don`t know of safe my idea. I tested 3-th variant with AIO for ATAPI. My tests is works. ftp://ftp.simtreas.ru/pub/my/qemu/qemu_aio.patch3.gz --w vodz