From: "Malte Schröder" <Malte.Schroeder@hanse.net>
To: Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: MalteSch@gmx.de, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bad X-performance on 2.6.6 & 2.6.7-rc1 on x86-64
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B5AD70.7000903@hanse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1085615502.4543.26.camel@duergar>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
| For completeness could you test the OSS emu10k driver (which supports
| PCM, while the ALSA driver does not) and see if you experience better
| overall performance? Like less CPU utilization etc... I'm very
| interested in finding out where the bottlenecks are. The emu10k1
| driver
| isn't perfect and neither are xine or mplayer so I'd like figure out
| what exactly is going on here. I'll of course do the same. It's just
| kind of hard to judge for me seeing as my system is now 4 years old.
I dont think it would make a difference sice cpu-time used by system is
really low since switching off mmap. But my overall experience with the
emu10k1 alsa-driver since it hit version 1.0 is quite good (before there
where some issues or should I say "annoyances" with the mixer). But if
you really want this I can rebuild my kernel and swith all that
oss-stuff back on ;)
Greets
- --
- ---------------------------------------
Malte Schröder
MalteSch@gmx.de
ICQ# 68121508
- ---------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAta1w4q3E2oMjYtURAt+AAJ0XTwmxsRsAgASfpfeWqs+DlQqdKwCfQ2Hy
dYqPGy93HVcqjYJTFsKyayE=
=nxDc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-27 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1ZqbC-5Gl-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-24 19:31 ` Bad X-performance on 2.6.6 & 2.6.7-rc1 on x86-64 Andi Kleen
2004-05-25 10:26 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-25 12:36 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-25 21:20 ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-25 21:32 ` Tomasz Torcz
2004-05-26 10:28 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-26 10:26 ` Malte Schröder
2004-05-26 23:51 ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-27 8:57 ` Malte Schröder [this message]
2004-05-24 16:00 Malte Schröder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40B5AD70.7000903@hanse.net \
--to=malte.schroeder@hanse.net \
--cc=MalteSch@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stan@ccs.neu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.