All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Correa <andre.correa@pobox.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ stability
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:21:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40B7BB61.9060709@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105066408632475@msgid-missing>


Hi Damion, the original IMQ implementation is under development by a 
group of people working at www.linuximq.net . There you'll find patchs 
for the lastest kernels and iptables, a simple FAQ and a mailling list.

IMQ is being used by a lot of people in diferent environments. Some of 
then, like mine, are production with a large bandwidth being shaped.

There are some known problem and we've being working on then. Two known 
issues are: some hangs trying to shape locally generated traffic and 
some rmmod problems on 2.6.

The 2.6 version of IMQ is just a port of the original 2.4 version.

I would like to invite you to join our mailling list and give IMQ a try. 
Right now it is more stable then people have being saying around and 
there are some guys working on it, releasing patchs for latest kernels 
and iptables and looking to its future.

Good luck.

Andre


Damion de Soto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've never actually even tried to use the IMQ device before,
> but I've watched the emails go back and forth on various problems 
> associated with it, and what looks like some general instability.
> 
> How stable is it really ?  Is it suitable for full-time use on a large 
> number of routers ?
> Has anyone used it on ipsec0 + eth0 devices for shaping ?
> 
> and lastly, any difference between the IMQ implementation on 2.4, and 
> that on 2.6 ?
> Are they both still being developed ?
> 
> thanks,
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-28 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-18 11:28 [LARTC] IMQ Stability hare ram
2004-01-23 17:29 ` Michael S. Kazmier
2004-01-24 23:24 ` Roy
2004-01-24 23:38 ` mkazmier
2004-01-25  2:04 ` Alexander Clouter
2004-01-25  3:49 ` Roy
2004-01-25  8:56 ` Aron Brand
2004-01-26 10:36 ` Remus
2004-01-26 15:53 ` Michael S. Kazmier
2004-01-26 18:49 ` rubens
2004-01-27  0:39 ` Alexander Clouter
2004-01-28  8:25 ` Alexander Trotsai
2004-05-26 23:56 ` [LARTC] IMQ stability Damion de Soto
2004-05-28 22:21 ` Andre Correa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40B7BB61.9060709@pobox.com \
    --to=andre.correa@pobox.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.