From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Furniss Subject: Re: [linuximq] Re: [PATCH] pom-ng version of IMQ target (file is attached this time) Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 13:59:47 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40BB2C43.90704@dsl.pipex.com> References: <40A29E4A.94165870@info-link.net> <40A2D9D8.2050201@trash.net> <40A39C34.639DC30E@info-link.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: linuximq@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <40A39C34.639DC30E@info-link.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Brad Fisher wrote: > Patrick McHardy wrote: > > >>Andre Correa already asked me about inclusion of the IMQ target. I would >>rather not include at this time it for two reasons: >> >>- IMQ still has stability problems >>- Jamal is working on a netfilter-independant replacement, I would like to >>see how it works out first. See >>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=108202471500003&r=1&w=2 >> >>Regards >>Patrick > > > That's fine, I wasn't really asking for inclusion quite yet (though I would > like to see it happen someday :). I just wanted to let people who may be > interested know that a pom-ng version of the patch existed. > > -Brad I am still not sure whether using Dummy will satisfy other IMQ users though, the thread above just deals with my setup - using ingress IMQ. There must be people on here using IMQ for egress/ multiple IMQs to solve their own problems. I changed IMQ to hook before NAT for egress, just to see if it worked, as someone on the LARTC list wanted to use ESFQ for a large NATed LAN - it appears to be OK - but will a netfilter independent replacement allow this sort of flexability? Andy.